The 3 As
The key ideas for the retreat were the 3As:
1. Appreciating the Past
2. Adapting the Present
3. Anticipating the Future.
Applying these 3As in AISS, to me would be:
Appreciating the Past:-
appreciating AISS’s past, growth and achievement; preserving our culture and tradition of the school, our core values; keeping old processes that have worked effectively; appreciating the work done and effort contributed by staff and team members.
Adapting the Present:-
integrating traditional teaching pedagogies and management processes to meet the current needs of education, pupils and society (e.gs., doing reflections and using ICT tools to enhance learning).
Anticipating the Future:-
building quality relationships with staff, pupils and stakeholders; inspiring staff and pupils; preparing our pupils for their future learning and work (e.gs. incorporating 21st Century Skills in the curriculum; connecting them to the world through ICT); developing staff competency, growth and development (e.gs. EPMS, IDEA framework, Talent Management)
So far, I feel that we are more or less moving on the right path to improving the school environment and are quite aligned with the 3As mentioned above. But we still have to improve on some of our processes. For example, the processes for our PTMs still have much room for improvement. The processes for each PTM so far were not consistent. All staff should be informed earlier the processes should there be any deviation from the previous PTM. Also, cohort dean system suddenly was just “abolished” not because the system is ineffective (I don’t recall any review has been done on it) but correct me if I am wrong, it is because of shortage of manpower.
According to Mr Larry Ng, URA Group Director and Registrar, Board of Architects, Singapore, during his speech at the retreat, planning ahead is important. What Singapore is today is due to what the government had planned many years ago, before many of us at the retreat are born. What I feel is that in AISS, we do plan but sometimes we don’t plan way ahead. Sometimes things are implemented without prior notice and not enough time for staff to be adjusted or to carry out. For example, during one of my department meetings, while my department Math ICT Activist was discussing about all Math teachers to be involved in creating and carrying out an ICT lesson in Term 3, we were then told out of the blue that the school may be having an e-learning day in Semester 2. It was a shock to me as I was totally unaware of it and hence did not prepare my teachers for it. It was a shock also because on top of the ICT lesson planning, teachers are also expected to set their prelim or end of year exam papers by the next staff meeting in June and Math teachers are already informed about a Math & Science Carnival to be held in Term 3; graduating classes teachers will also be busy preparing their classes for N and O level. With all these already planned, if they have to add on another load of preparing materials for an e-learning day would surely put them off. Teachers will again feel breathless if we have so many activities happening in a term, just like in Term 1 when we crammed all trainings during that period. Such decision, I feel should be brought up at SMC first for discussion on what to do and when is the best time to implement. As what Mr Larry Ng had also said, “planning is all about people”, this should be what goes through in our minds as we planned programmes in school.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Yes, Term 1 was hectic and these trainings were scheduled to close together. Looking back, I believe that we would not be able to change the number of trainings as each of them were critical: EL training (2 sessions), Semtrex (4 sessions) and Ask&Learn (1 sesson). What we could have done was to map these out for teachers, and manage the expectations better, to be prepare them better with understanding the importance of each of them.
Similarly, the ICT lesson infect is a decision made individually and separately by each IP to have at least 1 ICT lesson by each teacher. It wasn't communicated that these lessons will be on the same day in July (over the Youth Day holiday).
I am surprised that the Preliminary and Year End exams deadline during the June Staff Meeting is a surprise. This has been the practice that worked for teachers and HODs since last year which gives teachers more time to do proper vetting and more importantly, for HODs to have more time to vet. Again, we shouldn't assume that teachers are aware of this. We must communicate the schedule again.
I guess we must learn that as a team we must communicate clearly, clarify and check constantly so that we can engage and support our teachers. Thus, the issue is not the late planning, but the communication.
Post a Comment